Wikipedia by language difference


1.summary

Wikipedia has a lot of information. Depending on language, the same information may not be available.Wikipedia is a typical type of collective intelligence utilization.But there is a barrier to language.I feel the barrier of language as a Korean. There is a lot of information that is not available in Wikipedia in Korea. Koreans use other portals to search information rather than Wikipedia. Other portals are not as reliable as Wikipedia. That was uncomfortable for now, and while taking collective intelligence classes, I tried to expand Korea's influence by translating Korean information into English.I was careful not to miss out on my subject, and I used references to increase my credibility.Wikipedia, where the existence of information varies from language to language, needs to overcome language barriers.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

[10] What would make writing on Wikipedia easier for me?

<What would make writing on Wikipedia easier for me?>   Editing Wikipedia was always difficult for me. But not with the UI or language something, the difference of the culture and people was kinda confusing. So as I found how collaborative place Wikipedia is with Reagle's chapter 3-4, I understand this with my brain, but still sometimes don't get it very well.    For example, I had edited a brand's core value, and then someone in Wikipedia just reverted it and the reason was 'it's not important.'. WOW. As I am majoring in advertising and public relations, I think a brand's core value is a thing that makes the brand alive. But, I understand. Some would not think it as I think.    And another example, I had edited an idol members reward for brand power and also cited an credible news link, but someone reverted it and the reason was 'it is not a credible source. please don't use it.' I thought Korean Brand Power investigation was a po...
Read more

My edits on Wekipedia for this week

My edits on Wekipedia for this week This week, I edited Wikipedia about Kim Sang-ok. The reason why I first posted an article about Kim Sang Ok is because in class, my professor gave me the task of uploading information about a person who is not yet listed on the English Wikipedia. So I added an article about Kim Sang-ok, a Korean independence activist, to Wikipedia. Later, to add more information about Kim Sang-ok, I reviewed records related to Kim Sang-ok this week and added hiss life to Wikipedia. Posting information about Kim Sang-ok meant a lot to me. This is because Kim Sang-ok is one of the proud figures who tried to resist and fight against it at the time when Korea was ruled by Japan. Therefore, posting information about Kim Sang-ok on the English Wikipedia will be an opportunity for people of various nationalities as well as Koreans to have access to him. I would like to post information about various Korean characters while carrying out my future Wikipedia editing assi...
Read more

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5

Consensus is a very important issue in Wikipedia. Consensus is an important keyword in defining a problem because we live in contact with so many people and their opinions vary. Consensus can only be made between sensible editors who strive to maintain good faith and work together to more accurately and appropriately express different views on the subject. A small number of editors can reach an consensus decision among themselves. However, when the document draws the attention of others, someone who disagrees can come out. The first editors should not prevent further changes because they have already made a decision. No one, as well as a few editors, can unilaterally declare that a community agreement has been changed or confirmed. An editor who believes there is a valid reason for the consensus decision to be reversed can discuss in the discussion column to find out what other editors think is important, and compare and review various perspectives and reasons. What ...
Read more