My edits on Wekipedia for this week

My edits on Wekipedia for this week

This week, I edited Wikipedia about Kim Sang-ok. The reason why I first posted an article about Kim Sang Ok is because in class, my professor gave me the task of uploading information about a person who is not yet listed on the English Wikipedia. So I added an article about Kim Sang-ok, a Korean independence activist, to Wikipedia.

Later, to add more information about Kim Sang-ok, I reviewed records related to Kim Sang-ok this week and added hiss life to Wikipedia. Posting information about Kim Sang-ok meant a lot to me. This is because Kim Sang-ok is one of the proud figures who tried to resist and fight against it at the time when Korea was ruled by Japan. Therefore, posting information about Kim Sang-ok on the English Wikipedia will be an opportunity for people of various nationalities as well as Koreans to have access to him.

I would like to post information about various Korean characters while carrying out my future Wikipedia editing assignments. This is because I want to introduce important figures in Korea to people of various nationalities. What field of people in Korea would it be better to post information on English Wikipedia? I would be grateful if you could recommend me.

Comments

  1. Chominkook, 조민국May 4, 2019 at 12:39 PM

    Kim Sang-ok is a fairly famous independence activist in Korea, and it's amazing and surprising that he isn't in the English version of Wikipedia. I've looked up the Wikipedia edits to him and I think they're better organized than I thought.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4 I read the Reagle's chapters 3-4. I find two opinion. One thing is how to collaborate people on Wikipedia. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. How to collaborate people on Wikipedia. In the case of the English Wikipedia, there is a collaborative culture that asks its participants to assume two postures: a stance of neutral point of view on matters of knowledge, and a stance of good faith toward one’s fellow contributors. I think that people know the mood that must keep the rule on Wikipedia. If Wikipedia's mood is light, people write the light writing. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. I remember the discussion that Why the Women is smaller that the men on Wikipedia. I've heard from others the reason that women don't use it much because the community isn't friendly to women. I think that we try to create Wikipedia to use all the people no matter that the sex. I think it's a process ...
Read more

Discuss Reagle's Chapter3-4

In  the Reagle  Chapter 3-4, the troll and the ignore rules were impressive.  Troll is the one who destroys teamwork and leads the team to ruin.  Trolls, which are negative characters, help develop Wikipedia. Wikipedia finds the wrong information generated by the troll. And the information is modified by others. In that process, it results in more information production. There is an outlaw, similar to a troll. The lawless ignores all regulations, including copyright and reference. Like Trolls, they help develop Wikipedia. They are free to edit because they are out of regulation. The free edited content is modified by others, including attaching references and deleting content that is caught in copyright issues. Wikipedia develops as it takes care of these types of people.
Read more

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5 It is hard to understand this chapter. When I used the Wikipedia, I thought I don't need to group communication. Because the communication space is hidden, so I don't find it. I'm hard to find the communication space on Wikipedia. I think that the Wikipedia communication is not good at working in Korea. There are not many advisers on Korea Wikipedia. The Wiktionary definitions for consensus speak of “general agreement,” “without active opposition to the proposed course of action. I found it important for members to reach an agreement on Wikipedia. It's not an easy task, but I think it can produce a good results. So I think that's why Wikipedia exists. It can appear in a chat window, and go and talk to the other person's chat room. Perhaps it ends up as a personal versus personal matter, but I think that's also an agreement. If conversation does not take place, I don't think an agreement is reached either. Wiki...
Read more