#13 Can Wikipedia disappear?


# Can Wikipedia disappear?

I thought it was fun when I saw the topic of this blog. When I thought about the disappearance of Wikipedia, which is not a personal blog, Facebook account, or even a common Instagram account, I thought it wouldn't go away unless it was a great genius hacker. (This is what I thought in the 21st century, June 1, 2019. I've already learned that many people use Wikipedia in lectures. If Wikipedia disappears, everyone will use collective intelligence to find and revive it. I think group intelligence on the Internet has already permeated offline and offline group intelligence has been achieved. So even if the Wikipedia online, was dissipated by the Wikipedia spirit of collective intelligence, not to go away simply because they won't go away.


Discussion
: Who do you think would be the most damaging if Wikipedia disappeared?

Comments

  1. KIM BYEORI 김벼리June 2, 2019 at 3:11 AM

    If Wikipedia were to disappear, ordinary people like us would suffer the most. The general public, not experts, edits Wikipedia, but also uses edited information. We use a lot of Wikipedia information when we're doing personal tasks, or even when we're curious. If Wikipedia disappears like this, I think ordinary people like us will suffer the most.

    Byeori Kim 김벼리

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4 I read the Reagle's chapters 3-4. I find two opinion. One thing is how to collaborate people on Wikipedia. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. How to collaborate people on Wikipedia. In the case of the English Wikipedia, there is a collaborative culture that asks its participants to assume two postures: a stance of neutral point of view on matters of knowledge, and a stance of good faith toward one’s fellow contributors. I think that people know the mood that must keep the rule on Wikipedia. If Wikipedia's mood is light, people write the light writing. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. I remember the discussion that Why the Women is smaller that the men on Wikipedia. I've heard from others the reason that women don't use it much because the community isn't friendly to women. I think that we try to create Wikipedia to use all the people no matter that the sex. I think it's a process ...
Read more

Discuss Reagle's Chapter3-4

In  the Reagle  Chapter 3-4, the troll and the ignore rules were impressive.  Troll is the one who destroys teamwork and leads the team to ruin.  Trolls, which are negative characters, help develop Wikipedia. Wikipedia finds the wrong information generated by the troll. And the information is modified by others. In that process, it results in more information production. There is an outlaw, similar to a troll. The lawless ignores all regulations, including copyright and reference. Like Trolls, they help develop Wikipedia. They are free to edit because they are out of regulation. The free edited content is modified by others, including attaching references and deleting content that is caught in copyright issues. Wikipedia develops as it takes care of these types of people.
Read more

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5 It is hard to understand this chapter. When I used the Wikipedia, I thought I don't need to group communication. Because the communication space is hidden, so I don't find it. I'm hard to find the communication space on Wikipedia. I think that the Wikipedia communication is not good at working in Korea. There are not many advisers on Korea Wikipedia. The Wiktionary definitions for consensus speak of “general agreement,” “without active opposition to the proposed course of action. I found it important for members to reach an agreement on Wikipedia. It's not an easy task, but I think it can produce a good results. So I think that's why Wikipedia exists. It can appear in a chat window, and go and talk to the other person's chat room. Perhaps it ends up as a personal versus personal matter, but I think that's also an agreement. If conversation does not take place, I don't think an agreement is reached either. Wiki...
Read more