Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5

It is hard to understand this chapter.
When I used the Wikipedia, I thought I don't need to group communication.
Because the communication space is hidden, so I don't find it.
I'm hard to find the communication space on Wikipedia.
I think that the Wikipedia communication is not good at working in Korea.
There are not many advisers on Korea Wikipedia.

The Wiktionary definitions for consensus speak of “general agreement,” “without active opposition to the proposed course of action.

I found it important for members to reach an agreement on Wikipedia.
It's not an easy task, but I think it can produce a good results.
So I think that's why Wikipedia exists.
It can appear in a chat window, and go and talk to the other person's chat room.
Perhaps it ends up as a personal versus personal matter, but I think that's also an agreement.
If conversation does not take place, I don't think an agreement is reached either.

Wikipedia hates voting, but I think it looks like democracy.
Because even a single person's story is recorded and communicated within it.
I think it is an important thing on Wikipedia.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4

Discuss Reagle's Chapter3-4