10: What would make writing on Wikipedia easier for me?


When I started editing, I did not understand well what sources I could use without other editors eliminating it, but as the classes continued and I continued editing it became easier and now I have more confidence in what I edit.

   If it were not for the classes and the mini course that Piotr said we have to do to for edit in Wikipedia, I think I would still be afraid to edit or if I continued editing I think I would have thousands of errors every time, so I think it would be best if all the people who join as new members of Wikipedia have to do the mini course to better understand how this great community works, because even so, there are times when I still have many doubts about Wikipedia. I think this would really help thousands of people and maybe even make the editors who deal with articles or Wikipedia doubts have less work.

   Adding that when we start editing, sometimes we are not sure which article we can write, so I thought about to make several lists, about singers, actors, film directors, books, etc., until I realized that I now had a great list of possible articles that I can edit, of course, not all can be edited because sometimes there are no reliable sources or are protected articles in Wikipedia and only some editors can edit them, it is worth noting that it is not the case of all, but there are times when it usually happens.

   I think another point in my favor is that I really like photography and when I knew we could upload photos, I started looking in my gallery and I realized that I had many photos that I could upload to Wikipedia to help enrich the articles. I am sure that many also like to photograph and that can make the assignment easier for them.

Garcia Guillen Ana Gabriela.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4 I read the Reagle's chapters 3-4. I find two opinion. One thing is how to collaborate people on Wikipedia. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. How to collaborate people on Wikipedia. In the case of the English Wikipedia, there is a collaborative culture that asks its participants to assume two postures: a stance of neutral point of view on matters of knowledge, and a stance of good faith toward one’s fellow contributors. I think that people know the mood that must keep the rule on Wikipedia. If Wikipedia's mood is light, people write the light writing. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. I remember the discussion that Why the Women is smaller that the men on Wikipedia. I've heard from others the reason that women don't use it much because the community isn't friendly to women. I think that we try to create Wikipedia to use all the people no matter that the sex. I think it's a process ...
Read more

Discuss Reagle's Chapter3-4

In  the Reagle  Chapter 3-4, the troll and the ignore rules were impressive.  Troll is the one who destroys teamwork and leads the team to ruin.  Trolls, which are negative characters, help develop Wikipedia. Wikipedia finds the wrong information generated by the troll. And the information is modified by others. In that process, it results in more information production. There is an outlaw, similar to a troll. The lawless ignores all regulations, including copyright and reference. Like Trolls, they help develop Wikipedia. They are free to edit because they are out of regulation. The free edited content is modified by others, including attaching references and deleting content that is caught in copyright issues. Wikipedia develops as it takes care of these types of people.
Read more

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5 It is hard to understand this chapter. When I used the Wikipedia, I thought I don't need to group communication. Because the communication space is hidden, so I don't find it. I'm hard to find the communication space on Wikipedia. I think that the Wikipedia communication is not good at working in Korea. There are not many advisers on Korea Wikipedia. The Wiktionary definitions for consensus speak of “general agreement,” “without active opposition to the proposed course of action. I found it important for members to reach an agreement on Wikipedia. It's not an easy task, but I think it can produce a good results. So I think that's why Wikipedia exists. It can appear in a chat window, and go and talk to the other person's chat room. Perhaps it ends up as a personal versus personal matter, but I think that's also an agreement. If conversation does not take place, I don't think an agreement is reached either. Wiki...
Read more