w6.How important is it to be civil online on the Internet?

Internet etiquette is a ritual that Internet users should have on other people on the Internet. In the real world, social activities between people have many ceremonies. In the virtual world of the Internet, there is also an unwritten rule. And etiquette, that is, network etiquette, for Internet users to comply. Neglecting the consequences of network etiquette may cause harassment to others, or even cause online wars or boycotts. Although it will not cause damage like the real world, it will not be a pleasant experience for the parties.
   Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia project. Features free content, free editing. Despite the freedom of speech, it is still necessary to abide by network etiquette. This is very basic. Although Wikipedia strongly supports the requirements of verifying neutrality in its official policy, Wikipedia is criticized by many people in the society for the ability of anyone to participate in editing, with the quality of the items and the accuracy of the information. Degree, the objectivity of presenting attitudes, and the inability to provide consistent and accurate content.
  There are ten rules for network etiquette.Rule 1：Remember the Human.Rule 2：Adhere to the same standards of behavior online that you follow in real life.Rule 3：Know where you are in cyberspace.Rule 4：Respect other people‘s time and bandwidth.Rule 5：Make yourself look good online.Rule 6：Share expert knowledge.Rule 7：Help keep flame wars under control.Rule 8：Respect other people‘s privacy.Rule 9：Don‘t abuse your power.Rule 10：Be forgiving of other people‘s mistakes.I hope that this information I searched on the Internet is correct and useful.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4 I read the Reagle's chapters 3-4. I find two opinion. One thing is how to collaborate people on Wikipedia. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. How to collaborate people on Wikipedia. In the case of the English Wikipedia, there is a collaborative culture that asks its participants to assume two postures: a stance of neutral point of view on matters of knowledge, and a stance of good faith toward one’s fellow contributors. I think that people know the mood that must keep the rule on Wikipedia. If Wikipedia's mood is light, people write the light writing. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. I remember the discussion that Why the Women is smaller that the men on Wikipedia. I've heard from others the reason that women don't use it much because the community isn't friendly to women. I think that we try to create Wikipedia to use all the people no matter that the sex. I think it's a process ...
Read more

Discuss Reagle's Chapter3-4

In  the Reagle  Chapter 3-4, the troll and the ignore rules were impressive.  Troll is the one who destroys teamwork and leads the team to ruin.  Trolls, which are negative characters, help develop Wikipedia. Wikipedia finds the wrong information generated by the troll. And the information is modified by others. In that process, it results in more information production. There is an outlaw, similar to a troll. The lawless ignores all regulations, including copyright and reference. Like Trolls, they help develop Wikipedia. They are free to edit because they are out of regulation. The free edited content is modified by others, including attaching references and deleting content that is caught in copyright issues. Wikipedia develops as it takes care of these types of people.
Read more

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5 It is hard to understand this chapter. When I used the Wikipedia, I thought I don't need to group communication. Because the communication space is hidden, so I don't find it. I'm hard to find the communication space on Wikipedia. I think that the Wikipedia communication is not good at working in Korea. There are not many advisers on Korea Wikipedia. The Wiktionary definitions for consensus speak of “general agreement,” “without active opposition to the proposed course of action. I found it important for members to reach an agreement on Wikipedia. It's not an easy task, but I think it can produce a good results. So I think that's why Wikipedia exists. It can appear in a chat window, and go and talk to the other person's chat room. Perhaps it ends up as a personal versus personal matter, but I think that's also an agreement. If conversation does not take place, I don't think an agreement is reached either. Wiki...
Read more