#2 Wikipedia editing


What I felt while Wikipedia editing

Usually I only used to use Wikipedia. Through is lesson, I made my first account of Wikipeia. At first , Wikipedia’s system and configuration felt difficult. “What’s the function of this button? , How do I put the picture here?” I was curious and it was hard to solve.



As I got used to editing methods and functions, Now I thought ‘What am I editing?’. Since then I have thought about what I’m interested in and what I usually do. ‘View Webtoons, shop where I worked part-time, what I learned in other classes, and so on”, I recalled and organized what I kinw. After, I searched for them and filled out what is lacking. The assignment is to edit 10 pieces per week, but I think it is to make mine and enjoy it.



I think it is necessary to quote an article. But I think there is a problem that private opinions, such as those written by citizens, seem to be an objective opinion. What should we do about these parts?

Comments

  1. Jina ParkMarch 17, 2019 at 4:27 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jina ParkMarch 17, 2019 at 4:31 AM

      I think we should avoid referring to the articles that contain personal opinions.

      Abusing an individual's opinion can generate fake news. There are a lot of fake news on the Internet. The distribution of fake news these days is becoming a big problem.

      So we should refer to the articles written by a credible press. Also we should try not to refer to the articles that contain the advertisement or the contents are unclear.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4 I read the Reagle's chapters 3-4. I find two opinion. One thing is how to collaborate people on Wikipedia. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. How to collaborate people on Wikipedia. In the case of the English Wikipedia, there is a collaborative culture that asks its participants to assume two postures: a stance of neutral point of view on matters of knowledge, and a stance of good faith toward one’s fellow contributors. I think that people know the mood that must keep the rule on Wikipedia. If Wikipedia's mood is light, people write the light writing. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. I remember the discussion that Why the Women is smaller that the men on Wikipedia. I've heard from others the reason that women don't use it much because the community isn't friendly to women. I think that we try to create Wikipedia to use all the people no matter that the sex. I think it's a process ...
Read more

Discuss Reagle's Chapter3-4

In  the Reagle  Chapter 3-4, the troll and the ignore rules were impressive.  Troll is the one who destroys teamwork and leads the team to ruin.  Trolls, which are negative characters, help develop Wikipedia. Wikipedia finds the wrong information generated by the troll. And the information is modified by others. In that process, it results in more information production. There is an outlaw, similar to a troll. The lawless ignores all regulations, including copyright and reference. Like Trolls, they help develop Wikipedia. They are free to edit because they are out of regulation. The free edited content is modified by others, including attaching references and deleting content that is caught in copyright issues. Wikipedia develops as it takes care of these types of people.
Read more

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5 It is hard to understand this chapter. When I used the Wikipedia, I thought I don't need to group communication. Because the communication space is hidden, so I don't find it. I'm hard to find the communication space on Wikipedia. I think that the Wikipedia communication is not good at working in Korea. There are not many advisers on Korea Wikipedia. The Wiktionary definitions for consensus speak of “general agreement,” “without active opposition to the proposed course of action. I found it important for members to reach an agreement on Wikipedia. It's not an easy task, but I think it can produce a good results. So I think that's why Wikipedia exists. It can appear in a chat window, and go and talk to the other person's chat room. Perhaps it ends up as a personal versus personal matter, but I think that's also an agreement. If conversation does not take place, I don't think an agreement is reached either. Wiki...
Read more