W4 the edit that I have made to Wiki-Jang Keonwoo 장건우

 I edited some articles in wiki last week. I edited about K4 granade machine gun, DIA and Kim Kwangsoo in Korean wiki.
The K4 granade machine gun is the official equipment of the ROK military. And I've used that machine gun before, so I searched it in Korean wiki. The article had only a very brief outline. I added development history of the machine gun, montable external equipment and ammo. However, I couldn't find many reference sources because the ROk military is trying very hard to protect its security. I found the reference soures on only 2~3 published documents and S&T motive which the manufacture company of K4 machine gun. 

 DIA is Korean idol group. Actually, I didn't need to edit the article because many people edited it already. I read the article carefully and I found a sentence there was no reference source. It was about a member, she is resting because of an injury. I added a news article was officially announced. 

Kim Kwangsoo is a CEO of MBK Entertainment that is Korean entertainment management agency. Although he is now bankrupt, but in 2000s, he had led Korea's pop culture.
The article had a frame-no reference. So I added some news articles for the reference to 'incident and controversy' part, I think this part is most important the reference. And I added his new suspicion in 2014 and news article about it.



I edited about Yangpyeong-dong and Seonyu-do in Seoul city. I used to live in Yangpyeong-dong and Seonyu-do is most famous park in Yangpyeong-dong. The article,Yangpyeong-dong had just one sentence. I refered to the Yeongdeungpo-gu official website and added Yangpyeong-dong's geographical position and education.
Also, I translated Seonyu-do article, Korean wiki into English wiki and added this frame.
    


 
 

 
     
 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4 I read the Reagle's chapters 3-4. I find two opinion. One thing is how to collaborate people on Wikipedia. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. How to collaborate people on Wikipedia. In the case of the English Wikipedia, there is a collaborative culture that asks its participants to assume two postures: a stance of neutral point of view on matters of knowledge, and a stance of good faith toward one’s fellow contributors. I think that people know the mood that must keep the rule on Wikipedia. If Wikipedia's mood is light, people write the light writing. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. I remember the discussion that Why the Women is smaller that the men on Wikipedia. I've heard from others the reason that women don't use it much because the community isn't friendly to women. I think that we try to create Wikipedia to use all the people no matter that the sex. I think it's a process ...
Read more

Discuss Reagle's Chapter3-4

In  the Reagle  Chapter 3-4, the troll and the ignore rules were impressive.  Troll is the one who destroys teamwork and leads the team to ruin.  Trolls, which are negative characters, help develop Wikipedia. Wikipedia finds the wrong information generated by the troll. And the information is modified by others. In that process, it results in more information production. There is an outlaw, similar to a troll. The lawless ignores all regulations, including copyright and reference. Like Trolls, they help develop Wikipedia. They are free to edit because they are out of regulation. The free edited content is modified by others, including attaching references and deleting content that is caught in copyright issues. Wikipedia develops as it takes care of these types of people.
Read more

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5 It is hard to understand this chapter. When I used the Wikipedia, I thought I don't need to group communication. Because the communication space is hidden, so I don't find it. I'm hard to find the communication space on Wikipedia. I think that the Wikipedia communication is not good at working in Korea. There are not many advisers on Korea Wikipedia. The Wiktionary definitions for consensus speak of “general agreement,” “without active opposition to the proposed course of action. I found it important for members to reach an agreement on Wikipedia. It's not an easy task, but I think it can produce a good results. So I think that's why Wikipedia exists. It can appear in a chat window, and go and talk to the other person's chat room. Perhaps it ends up as a personal versus personal matter, but I think that's also an agreement. If conversation does not take place, I don't think an agreement is reached either. Wiki...
Read more