W4. the edit that I have made to Wiki in last week


W4. the edit that I have made to Wiki in last week
One of the writings I edited in wiki last week is "Pansori." I wrote about my first edit in this blog. As I mentioned there, I am very interested in 'Korean tradition and culture.' So all the categories I edit these days are related to this section. Many related information was written on "Pansori" because it is one of the traditional Korean music that many Koreans and foreigners are interested in. But the video of "Pansori" was not linked. So I attached an official YouTube link.
I also deleted the original writing about the meaning of "Pansori". It was too brief and lacking in explanation. And I found the data and wrote a new explanation. I also explained how much traditional Korean music is worth.

 However, I was concerned about copyright when I attached a YouTube link. The person who filmed the performance "Pansori" uploaded it to YouTube, and I attached it to Wiki again in a link format. Is there nothing wrong with my copyright? In fact, besides "Pansori," I have often wanted to attach voice or actual performance videos in relation to other traditional Korean music. This is the first challenge. 
Can I keep trying like this?
This is the link, one of the my edit in last week
: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pansori

Comments

  1. Kim ju hwan 김주환March 30, 2019 at 11:33 PM

    I think it's a pity that concerns about copyright have caused problems in updating information. To address that concern, it seems that the first task to be solved is to acquire sufficient knowledge of copyright. Also, it would be nice to find out how copyright works in Wikipedia. I hope you will use the video to improve the quality of your information!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4 I read the Reagle's chapters 3-4. I find two opinion. One thing is how to collaborate people on Wikipedia. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. How to collaborate people on Wikipedia. In the case of the English Wikipedia, there is a collaborative culture that asks its participants to assume two postures: a stance of neutral point of view on matters of knowledge, and a stance of good faith toward one’s fellow contributors. I think that people know the mood that must keep the rule on Wikipedia. If Wikipedia's mood is light, people write the light writing. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. I remember the discussion that Why the Women is smaller that the men on Wikipedia. I've heard from others the reason that women don't use it much because the community isn't friendly to women. I think that we try to create Wikipedia to use all the people no matter that the sex. I think it's a process ...
Read more

Discuss Reagle's Chapter3-4

In  the Reagle  Chapter 3-4, the troll and the ignore rules were impressive.  Troll is the one who destroys teamwork and leads the team to ruin.  Trolls, which are negative characters, help develop Wikipedia. Wikipedia finds the wrong information generated by the troll. And the information is modified by others. In that process, it results in more information production. There is an outlaw, similar to a troll. The lawless ignores all regulations, including copyright and reference. Like Trolls, they help develop Wikipedia. They are free to edit because they are out of regulation. The free edited content is modified by others, including attaching references and deleting content that is caught in copyright issues. Wikipedia develops as it takes care of these types of people.
Read more

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5 It is hard to understand this chapter. When I used the Wikipedia, I thought I don't need to group communication. Because the communication space is hidden, so I don't find it. I'm hard to find the communication space on Wikipedia. I think that the Wikipedia communication is not good at working in Korea. There are not many advisers on Korea Wikipedia. The Wiktionary definitions for consensus speak of “general agreement,” “without active opposition to the proposed course of action. I found it important for members to reach an agreement on Wikipedia. It's not an easy task, but I think it can produce a good results. So I think that's why Wikipedia exists. It can appear in a chat window, and go and talk to the other person's chat room. Perhaps it ends up as a personal versus personal matter, but I think that's also an agreement. If conversation does not take place, I don't think an agreement is reached either. Wiki...
Read more