blog assignment 3. wikis and internet 2.0

summary
Wikipedia is part of web 2.0. Web sites allow individuals to contribute and interact with their content.
Other web 2.0 includes social networking sites and blog video sharing.
Web 1.0 made it impossible for users to interact with each other on the Web site. So users have chosen to send emails to authors or authorities.
Web 2.0 has become an important force in changing our culture and allowing people to participate without limit.
Things like Google and Naver intellectuals can be a kind of web 2.0.
The advantage of web 2.0 is that many people participate and share information with each other. It is a form of collective intelligence.


interesting
facebook, flicker, google, twitter etc .. These started to develop in the 2000s. It was similar to the time when the Internet began to revive. In Korea, however, we started to use facebook, flicker, google, twitter etc in 2010.

discussion
Naver intellectuals are using a lot of people in our country, but in fact, they are not using as much as Wikipedia. What difference does it make people trust the wiki more?

Comments

  1. Jina ParkMarch 23, 2019 at 8:27 PM

    Hi. I read your article well:)

    I don't know how to call '네이버 지식in'. Maybe I can call it 'Naver Jisik-in' or 'Naver Knowledge-in'.
    Anyway, I think that comparing 'Naver Jisik-in' with Wikipedia would be a good study.

    'Naver Jisik-in' is not an encyclopedia. It's in the form of q&a and no reference is required to produce an answer. Its questions and answers may include personal experience. And It's often used as a channel of unprofessional consultations or as a place to ask for specific solutions to the problem than to obtain clear information.

    Therefore, people use Wikipedia or 'Naver Jisik-in' according to their needs.


    -------------------------------------------------
    There is an article about 'Naver Jisik-in' in Wikipedia, so it would be good to check them out. But unfortunately, there is only Korean article about 'Naver Jisik-in'.

    https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EC%A7%80%EC%8B%9DiN


    - Jina Park 박진아 -

    ReplyDelete
  2. shingieunJune 27, 2019 at 10:08 PM

    Reference attachments are almost essential for Wikipedia. But Naver doesn't.If Wikipedia does not attach a reference, a warning email is sent out. I even received such an email. Naver, however, has no regulations under it. There were even reactions that were irrelevant to the content. That's why people trust Wikipedia more than Naver.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4 I read the Reagle's chapters 3-4. I find two opinion. One thing is how to collaborate people on Wikipedia. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. How to collaborate people on Wikipedia. In the case of the English Wikipedia, there is a collaborative culture that asks its participants to assume two postures: a stance of neutral point of view on matters of knowledge, and a stance of good faith toward one’s fellow contributors. I think that people know the mood that must keep the rule on Wikipedia. If Wikipedia's mood is light, people write the light writing. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. I remember the discussion that Why the Women is smaller that the men on Wikipedia. I've heard from others the reason that women don't use it much because the community isn't friendly to women. I think that we try to create Wikipedia to use all the people no matter that the sex. I think it's a process ...
Read more

Discuss Reagle's Chapter3-4

In  the Reagle  Chapter 3-4, the troll and the ignore rules were impressive.  Troll is the one who destroys teamwork and leads the team to ruin.  Trolls, which are negative characters, help develop Wikipedia. Wikipedia finds the wrong information generated by the troll. And the information is modified by others. In that process, it results in more information production. There is an outlaw, similar to a troll. The lawless ignores all regulations, including copyright and reference. Like Trolls, they help develop Wikipedia. They are free to edit because they are out of regulation. The free edited content is modified by others, including attaching references and deleting content that is caught in copyright issues. Wikipedia develops as it takes care of these types of people.
Read more

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5 It is hard to understand this chapter. When I used the Wikipedia, I thought I don't need to group communication. Because the communication space is hidden, so I don't find it. I'm hard to find the communication space on Wikipedia. I think that the Wikipedia communication is not good at working in Korea. There are not many advisers on Korea Wikipedia. The Wiktionary definitions for consensus speak of “general agreement,” “without active opposition to the proposed course of action. I found it important for members to reach an agreement on Wikipedia. It's not an easy task, but I think it can produce a good results. So I think that's why Wikipedia exists. It can appear in a chat window, and go and talk to the other person's chat room. Perhaps it ends up as a personal versus personal matter, but I think that's also an agreement. If conversation does not take place, I don't think an agreement is reached either. Wiki...
Read more