Blog assignment 1. what is wikipedia?/ kim hyun young

what is wikipedia?

summarize

Wikipedia is the most famous and popular reference work in the world.
Wikipedia contains information about many countries and is made up of several languages.
Wikipedia is an example of collective intelligence, and many people will participate in it in the future.
Wikipedia can be edited by many people and information can be modified.
It is that the intelligence of many people can make better information. 
Wikipedia has an account of 40 million, and it has about 80000 editors per month.
This trend is expected to increase further in the future.

interesting

Wikipedia is realistic? I had a discussion about the question. Wikipedia is a place where everyone can freely share their knowledge on their own.
Many different opinions came out during the debate. Some have pointed to Wikipedia's shortcomings due to copyright issues.
It can cause confusion because many people can be ruthlessly modified and changed at any time.
But with technology development, as the Internet evolves,
An environment where individuals can freely participate, not just in any business or large organization, has been created, and Wikipedia is designed for that era.
It can be inferred that the ability of a person to modify and edit information can be transformed into more accurate information.
Websites like Wikipedia are likely to be created in the future, and given the current popularity of Wikipedia, collective intelligence is one of the things that is relevant to this era.

discussion

What is the difference between Wikipedia, an example of collective intelligence, and other collective intelligence?
Is it just that anyone can participate and modify?

Comments

  1. 이예원 (yewon Lee)March 9, 2019 at 4:10 AM

    I think that wiki is kind of dictionary. it has a form of dictionary. Dictionary which is a form of book is very heavy and no update new information. but wiki can update information useful. and not heavy. other collective intelligence is point that discusses the opinion. other has windows of discussion.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4 I read the Reagle's chapters 3-4. I find two opinion. One thing is how to collaborate people on Wikipedia. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. How to collaborate people on Wikipedia. In the case of the English Wikipedia, there is a collaborative culture that asks its participants to assume two postures: a stance of neutral point of view on matters of knowledge, and a stance of good faith toward one’s fellow contributors. I think that people know the mood that must keep the rule on Wikipedia. If Wikipedia's mood is light, people write the light writing. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. I remember the discussion that Why the Women is smaller that the men on Wikipedia. I've heard from others the reason that women don't use it much because the community isn't friendly to women. I think that we try to create Wikipedia to use all the people no matter that the sex. I think it's a process ...
Read more

Discuss Reagle's Chapter3-4

In  the Reagle  Chapter 3-4, the troll and the ignore rules were impressive.  Troll is the one who destroys teamwork and leads the team to ruin.  Trolls, which are negative characters, help develop Wikipedia. Wikipedia finds the wrong information generated by the troll. And the information is modified by others. In that process, it results in more information production. There is an outlaw, similar to a troll. The lawless ignores all regulations, including copyright and reference. Like Trolls, they help develop Wikipedia. They are free to edit because they are out of regulation. The free edited content is modified by others, including attaching references and deleting content that is caught in copyright issues. Wikipedia develops as it takes care of these types of people.
Read more

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5 It is hard to understand this chapter. When I used the Wikipedia, I thought I don't need to group communication. Because the communication space is hidden, so I don't find it. I'm hard to find the communication space on Wikipedia. I think that the Wikipedia communication is not good at working in Korea. There are not many advisers on Korea Wikipedia. The Wiktionary definitions for consensus speak of “general agreement,” “without active opposition to the proposed course of action. I found it important for members to reach an agreement on Wikipedia. It's not an easy task, but I think it can produce a good results. So I think that's why Wikipedia exists. It can appear in a chat window, and go and talk to the other person's chat room. Perhaps it ends up as a personal versus personal matter, but I think that's also an agreement. If conversation does not take place, I don't think an agreement is reached either. Wiki...
Read more