4.My first edit and summary （guoyigao）

Through the last edit, I felt the fun of editing Wikipedia. I think that as I edit more times and they will keep my writing, I will like it more and more, and I am very happy with me. The last edit was retained, so I decided to continue to improve this entry.
  The content of my editorial is that I have perfected the population data of Yucheng County. The Wikipedia shows the population data for 2002, and as of 2014, the population has reached 355,000 residents. So I added this data to make the project look a bit more complete. By constantly writing I feel that I should be more careful to add content. I like that they will adopt my opinion. Next time I think I will try to add some new windows.
   Questions about the writing of Wikipedia: If I see the information I want to improve from other places, I have not copied them directly, but instead translated into my own ideas and wrote them, which will cause trouble. Will the owner of the entry delete my editor?

Comments

  1. mjphomeMarch 30, 2019 at 3:19 AM

    As I understand it in the 'Collective Intelligence' class, you can use reference and edit and post your own style at the same time. In other words, you can use various references to gain credibility and objectivity and change the same meaning into your language, not upload it in the same style.
    If you do so, there will be no big problem. I hope my reply is a helpful answer to your concern.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4 I read the Reagle's chapters 3-4. I find two opinion. One thing is how to collaborate people on Wikipedia. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. How to collaborate people on Wikipedia. In the case of the English Wikipedia, there is a collaborative culture that asks its participants to assume two postures: a stance of neutral point of view on matters of knowledge, and a stance of good faith toward one’s fellow contributors. I think that people know the mood that must keep the rule on Wikipedia. If Wikipedia's mood is light, people write the light writing. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. I remember the discussion that Why the Women is smaller that the men on Wikipedia. I've heard from others the reason that women don't use it much because the community isn't friendly to women. I think that we try to create Wikipedia to use all the people no matter that the sex. I think it's a process ...
Read more

Discuss Reagle's Chapter3-4

In  the Reagle  Chapter 3-4, the troll and the ignore rules were impressive.  Troll is the one who destroys teamwork and leads the team to ruin.  Trolls, which are negative characters, help develop Wikipedia. Wikipedia finds the wrong information generated by the troll. And the information is modified by others. In that process, it results in more information production. There is an outlaw, similar to a troll. The lawless ignores all regulations, including copyright and reference. Like Trolls, they help develop Wikipedia. They are free to edit because they are out of regulation. The free edited content is modified by others, including attaching references and deleting content that is caught in copyright issues. Wikipedia develops as it takes care of these types of people.
Read more

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5 It is hard to understand this chapter. When I used the Wikipedia, I thought I don't need to group communication. Because the communication space is hidden, so I don't find it. I'm hard to find the communication space on Wikipedia. I think that the Wikipedia communication is not good at working in Korea. There are not many advisers on Korea Wikipedia. The Wiktionary definitions for consensus speak of “general agreement,” “without active opposition to the proposed course of action. I found it important for members to reach an agreement on Wikipedia. It's not an easy task, but I think it can produce a good results. So I think that's why Wikipedia exists. It can appear in a chat window, and go and talk to the other person's chat room. Perhaps it ends up as a personal versus personal matter, but I think that's also an agreement. If conversation does not take place, I don't think an agreement is reached either. Wiki...
Read more