#2. My first edit.

Jeong Seo Yoon, 정서윤

Short Impression
I don't think I'll ever edit Wikipedia. I don't think I'll ever edit Wikipedia. Every time I looked for information on Wikipedia, I didn't know I had such qualifications and abilities. Of course, it's because I learned a lot of Although online, I felt a great deal of responsibility for editing information that hundreds of thousands of people see. Who will need this article by what way? It was a small pleasure to edit for somebody. I'm a little proud that I spend a few hours a week contributing to Wiki editing.

Thinking about what to edit, I naturally concentrated on things that I had been interested in. I wrote about people and traditional culture that I was interested in.

A Part of Edit List
<Park Wan-suh> died in 2011 as a famous Korean novelist. Her interview collection 'The Words of Park Wan-suh' was newly published last year, adding to the story. 
<Ueno Chizuko> is a Japanese sociologist and Japan's "best-known feminist".who recently Since there is nothing on Korean wiki, it has been translated and translated into English wiki.
The dance category of the <Fungmul> is empty, so I added the contents by referring to the paper. The work of filling in the empty area was most rewarding.
Several theories of its origin have been added in the article of <Talchum>. It took time to find and read the related journal, but it was interesting because I was curious about it.
In the case of <Busan International Advertising Festival>, there was no item in itself, so I created a new article. It was a big event that marks its 11th year this year, so I was a little surprised that no items were made.

My discussion
When it comes to dealing with things about other cultures, I certainly felt that the points that other countries and their countries focus on are slightly different. The detailed description of the book in Korea and the point that the English culture circle sees are different.
Also, as I may not feel well in English, Wikipedia in Korea has a slightly different style of writing in each article. Especially when there are a large number of participants. I could feel that each category was a different participant. Is this style also one of the characteristics of collective intelligence like a Wikipedia? Or is it something to need unified formed? I'm very curious about that.

Comments

  1. KIM BYEORI 김벼리March 16, 2019 at 11:37 PM

    Your idea certainly seems to be an interesting discussion. To begin with, I think the different styles of Wikipedia's writings may be one of the characteristics of collective intelligence. The nature of Wikipedia itself is edited by many people, so I think it's perfectly natural that different styles of writing on a subject appear. I don't think unified formation is necessary to maintain a certain style. Wikipedia is meaningful in sharing various information by various people, so I feel that putting restrictions on the format of the text will be no different from other general encyclopedias. Isn't information from a variety of perspectives, different styles of texts etc, are the characteristics of Wikipedia alone?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jeong Seo YoonMarch 17, 2019 at 4:47 AM

      Thank you for your answer! It really helps to solve the question! Also, I find 'the styles' increasingly attractive.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4 I read the Reagle's chapters 3-4. I find two opinion. One thing is how to collaborate people on Wikipedia. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. How to collaborate people on Wikipedia. In the case of the English Wikipedia, there is a collaborative culture that asks its participants to assume two postures: a stance of neutral point of view on matters of knowledge, and a stance of good faith toward one’s fellow contributors. I think that people know the mood that must keep the rule on Wikipedia. If Wikipedia's mood is light, people write the light writing. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. I remember the discussion that Why the Women is smaller that the men on Wikipedia. I've heard from others the reason that women don't use it much because the community isn't friendly to women. I think that we try to create Wikipedia to use all the people no matter that the sex. I think it's a process ...
Read more

Discuss Reagle's Chapter3-4

In  the Reagle  Chapter 3-4, the troll and the ignore rules were impressive.  Troll is the one who destroys teamwork and leads the team to ruin.  Trolls, which are negative characters, help develop Wikipedia. Wikipedia finds the wrong information generated by the troll. And the information is modified by others. In that process, it results in more information production. There is an outlaw, similar to a troll. The lawless ignores all regulations, including copyright and reference. Like Trolls, they help develop Wikipedia. They are free to edit because they are out of regulation. The free edited content is modified by others, including attaching references and deleting content that is caught in copyright issues. Wikipedia develops as it takes care of these types of people.
Read more

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5 It is hard to understand this chapter. When I used the Wikipedia, I thought I don't need to group communication. Because the communication space is hidden, so I don't find it. I'm hard to find the communication space on Wikipedia. I think that the Wikipedia communication is not good at working in Korea. There are not many advisers on Korea Wikipedia. The Wiktionary definitions for consensus speak of “general agreement,” “without active opposition to the proposed course of action. I found it important for members to reach an agreement on Wikipedia. It's not an easy task, but I think it can produce a good results. So I think that's why Wikipedia exists. It can appear in a chat window, and go and talk to the other person's chat room. Perhaps it ends up as a personal versus personal matter, but I think that's also an agreement. If conversation does not take place, I don't think an agreement is reached either. Wiki...
Read more