W13 Can wiki disappear?

  I don't think Wikipedia will disappear, although it has many problems.
  Wikipedia's advantages are why people use it. For example, Wikipedia is run by a non-profit organization, and the source of funding for website maintenance is crowdsourcing and donation. It also controls entries that are commercially propaganda-oriented. So there will be no advertisements in Wikipedia, and it can also guarantee fairness and objectivity to a certain extent. This is a difficult point for other network encyclopedias, and Wikipedia has absolute advantages in this respect.
  At the same time, Wikipedia is also popular because of its many entries and comprehensive explanations, and each entry has different language explanations, covering almost all disciplines, making it easy for people around the world to see, which makes many professionals more dependent on Wikipedia.
  And from my experience, even those who are new to Wikipedia can make their own contributions here, which gives beginners a great sense of participation. Overall, different people have different editorial guidelines. Some people only slightly revise the original text, some people like to make a big change, but here, there is a lot of space to accommodate all of the above. It would be great if someone added a perfect entry, but one of the benefits of Wikipedia is that incomplete or poorly drafted entries can be polished by collaborative editing.
  If Wikipedia were to be closed one day, it would be a great loss to mankind.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4 I read the Reagle's chapters 3-4. I find two opinion. One thing is how to collaborate people on Wikipedia. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. How to collaborate people on Wikipedia. In the case of the English Wikipedia, there is a collaborative culture that asks its participants to assume two postures: a stance of neutral point of view on matters of knowledge, and a stance of good faith toward one’s fellow contributors. I think that people know the mood that must keep the rule on Wikipedia. If Wikipedia's mood is light, people write the light writing. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. I remember the discussion that Why the Women is smaller that the men on Wikipedia. I've heard from others the reason that women don't use it much because the community isn't friendly to women. I think that we try to create Wikipedia to use all the people no matter that the sex. I think it's a process ...
Read more

Discuss Reagle's Chapter3-4

In  the Reagle  Chapter 3-4, the troll and the ignore rules were impressive.  Troll is the one who destroys teamwork and leads the team to ruin.  Trolls, which are negative characters, help develop Wikipedia. Wikipedia finds the wrong information generated by the troll. And the information is modified by others. In that process, it results in more information production. There is an outlaw, similar to a troll. The lawless ignores all regulations, including copyright and reference. Like Trolls, they help develop Wikipedia. They are free to edit because they are out of regulation. The free edited content is modified by others, including attaching references and deleting content that is caught in copyright issues. Wikipedia develops as it takes care of these types of people.
Read more

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5 It is hard to understand this chapter. When I used the Wikipedia, I thought I don't need to group communication. Because the communication space is hidden, so I don't find it. I'm hard to find the communication space on Wikipedia. I think that the Wikipedia communication is not good at working in Korea. There are not many advisers on Korea Wikipedia. The Wiktionary definitions for consensus speak of “general agreement,” “without active opposition to the proposed course of action. I found it important for members to reach an agreement on Wikipedia. It's not an easy task, but I think it can produce a good results. So I think that's why Wikipedia exists. It can appear in a chat window, and go and talk to the other person's chat room. Perhaps it ends up as a personal versus personal matter, but I think that's also an agreement. If conversation does not take place, I don't think an agreement is reached either. Wiki...
Read more