#9. Discuss Reagle's Chapter3-4

2015048031 Jeong Seo Yoon

In chapter 4, we finally think about Wikipedia's openness. There have been numerous discussions about how everything in Wikipedia is possible, but Wikipedia says 'Ignore All Rules,' "if rules prevent you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, you can ignore it." But it also says it does not mean that all actions can be justified. It is said that there is no alternative to good judgment, just to contribute freely, and to improve the encyclopedia. However, the concept of openness is still an important component of Wikipedia.

The writer describes Wikipedia as the five features of the open contents community. The five concepts are as follows.
<Open content, Transparity, Integrity, Nondiscrimination, Noninterference>

Wikipedia is an example of a public content community, but when practicing openness, it is sometimes difficult to strike a balance with issues such as freedom of speech, public opinion, transparency, and a nondiscriminatory structure. However, I strongly agree that Wikipedia is qualified as a forum to discuss how to balance the value you ultimately want to pursue. Wikipedia's core debating capabilities could contribute greatly to other communities as well.

Question: Do you have any memorable discussion cases when editing crisis media? I once had a conversation with a foreign user asking for confirmation of the reference. It was very interesting, but on the other hand, I was afraid to give the wrong information. How can one assume that an individual has more than one level of norms? I'm always amazed by this incredible trust.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4

Discuss Reagle’s chapters 3-4 I read the Reagle's chapters 3-4. I find two opinion. One thing is how to collaborate people on Wikipedia. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. How to collaborate people on Wikipedia. In the case of the English Wikipedia, there is a collaborative culture that asks its participants to assume two postures: a stance of neutral point of view on matters of knowledge, and a stance of good faith toward one’s fellow contributors. I think that people know the mood that must keep the rule on Wikipedia. If Wikipedia's mood is light, people write the light writing. Other is how to make open community on Wikipedia. I remember the discussion that Why the Women is smaller that the men on Wikipedia. I've heard from others the reason that women don't use it much because the community isn't friendly to women. I think that we try to create Wikipedia to use all the people no matter that the sex. I think it's a process ...
Read more

Discuss Reagle's Chapter3-4

In  the Reagle  Chapter 3-4, the troll and the ignore rules were impressive.  Troll is the one who destroys teamwork and leads the team to ruin.  Trolls, which are negative characters, help develop Wikipedia. Wikipedia finds the wrong information generated by the troll. And the information is modified by others. In that process, it results in more information production. There is an outlaw, similar to a troll. The lawless ignores all regulations, including copyright and reference. Like Trolls, they help develop Wikipedia. They are free to edit because they are out of regulation. The free edited content is modified by others, including attaching references and deleting content that is caught in copyright issues. Wikipedia develops as it takes care of these types of people.
Read more

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5

Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5 It is hard to understand this chapter. When I used the Wikipedia, I thought I don't need to group communication. Because the communication space is hidden, so I don't find it. I'm hard to find the communication space on Wikipedia. I think that the Wikipedia communication is not good at working in Korea. There are not many advisers on Korea Wikipedia. The Wiktionary definitions for consensus speak of “general agreement,” “without active opposition to the proposed course of action. I found it important for members to reach an agreement on Wikipedia. It's not an easy task, but I think it can produce a good results. So I think that's why Wikipedia exists. It can appear in a chat window, and go and talk to the other person's chat room. Perhaps it ends up as a personal versus personal matter, but I think that's also an agreement. If conversation does not take place, I don't think an agreement is reached either. Wiki...
Read more